← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Fatback vs Kershaw Filter

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 29% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Filter stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 29% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 40% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Fatback — Blade length: 89 mm (3.50 in)Kershaw Fatback — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Kershaw Fatback — Blade thickness: 3.75 mm (0.15 in)Kershaw Fatback — Weight: 102 g (3.60 oz)Kershaw Fatback — Retail price: US$43.99Kershaw Fatback — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)Kershaw Filter — Blade length: 83 mm (3.27 in)Kershaw Filter — Closed length: 114 mm (4.49 in)Kershaw Filter — Blade thickness: 2.7 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Filter — Weight: 143 g (5.04 oz)Kershaw Filter — Retail price: US$41.99Kershaw Filter — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)Blade lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail priceOverall length
Price & carry
Retail price
US$43.99Most expensive
US$41.99Cheapest
Weight
102 g (3.60 oz)Lightest
143 g (5.04 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
89 mm (3.50 in)Longest
83 mm (3.27 in)Shortest
Overall length
197 mm (7.76 in)
197 mm (7.76 in)
Closed length
108 mm (4.25 in)Shortest
114 mm (4.49 in)Longest
Blade thickness
3.75 mm (0.15 in)Thickest
2.7 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV
4Cr14 stainless steel
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon
Stainless steel
Finish
Black-oxide coating
Black-Oxide BlackWash coating on blade and handle
Lock type
Liner Lock
Frame lock
Opening method
Assisted opening with flipper
Assisted opening with flipper and thumb stud
Clip type
4-position deep-carry (right/left; tip-up/down)
Single-position deep-carry pocketclip, right side, tip-down
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryTactical use
Everyday carryWork
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Good grip due to aggressive texturingReliable assisted openingVersatile ambidextrous pocket clip positionsAffordable price
Well-balanced and solid frame lock actionComfortable stainless steel handle with smooth contouringProtective BlackWash coating hides wear and resists scratchesFast and easy one-handed assisted opening via flipper and thumb stud
Common complaints
Unknown
None clearly documented in provided sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online