← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Fatback vs Kershaw Oso Sweet

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Lightest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for overall length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the longest option for overall length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Fatback — Blade length: 89 mm (3.50 in)Kershaw Fatback — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)Kershaw Fatback — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Kershaw Fatback — Blade thickness: 3.75 mm (0.15 in)Kershaw Fatback — Weight: 102 g (3.60 oz)Kershaw Fatback — Retail price: US$43.99Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$43.99
US$43.99
Weight
102 g (3.60 oz)Heaviest
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
89 mm (3.50 in)Longest
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Shortest
Overall length
197 mm (7.76 in)Longest
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Shortest
Closed length
108 mm (4.25 in)Longest
105 mm (4.13 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3.75 mm (0.15 in)Thickest
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Finish
Black-oxide coating
Satin finish blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Assisted opening with flipper
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Clip type
4-position deep-carry (right/left; tip-up/down)
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryTactical use
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Good grip due to aggressive texturingReliable assisted openingVersatile ambidextrous pocket clip positionsAffordable price
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Common complaints
Unknown
None clearly supported by sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online