Kershaw Fatback stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Fatback stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 79% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Cheapest
Kershaw Fatback stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 79% gap from the closest alternative.
Most expensive
Kershaw Link stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 377% gap from the closest alternative.
Lightest
Kershaw Fatback stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative.
Heaviest
Kershaw Link stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 31% gap from the closest alternative.
Shortest
Kershaw Fatback stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.
Longest
Kershaw Link stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.
Shortest
Kershaw Link stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.
Longest
Kershaw Fatback stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
✓Good Grip Due To Aggressive Texturing✓Reliable Assisted Opening✓Versatile Ambidextrous Pocket Clip Positions✓Affordable Price
✓Excellent Blade Quality With Superior Edge Retention✓Solid All Metal Construction✓Comfortable Grip And Ergonomics✓Assisted Opening And Secure Liner Lock✓Reversible Tip Up Pocket Clip
Common complaints
Unknown
⚠Heavy And Bulky Compared To Average Pocket Knives⚠Assisted Opening Requires Some Force⚠Closing One Handed Can Be Challenging