← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Fatback vs Kershaw Link

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Fatback stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 79% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 79% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Link stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 377% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Link stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 31% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Link stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Link stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Fatback — Blade length: 89 mm (3.50 in)Kershaw Fatback — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)Kershaw Fatback — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Kershaw Fatback — Blade thickness: 3.75 mm (0.15 in)Kershaw Fatback — Weight: 102 g (3.60 oz)Kershaw Fatback — Retail price: US$43.99Kershaw Link — Blade length: 82.55 mm (3.25 in)Kershaw Link — Overall length: 193.04 mm (7.60 in)Kershaw Link — Closed length: 111.76 mm (4.40 in)Kershaw Link — Blade thickness: 2.7 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Link — Weight: 133.52 g (4.71 oz)Kershaw Link — Retail price: US$210Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$43.99Cheapest
US$210Most expensive
Weight
102 g (3.60 oz)Lightest
133.52 g (4.71 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
89 mm (3.50 in)Longest
82.55 mm (3.25 in)Shortest
Overall length
197 mm (7.76 in)Longest
193.04 mm (7.60 in)Shortest
Closed length
108 mm (4.25 in)Shortest
111.76 mm (4.40 in)Longest
Blade thickness
3.75 mm (0.15 in)Thickest
2.7 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV
CPM MagnaCut stainless steel (current models) / Damascus (limited edition)
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon
Anodized Aluminum
Finish
Black-oxide coating
Stonewashed blade finish
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Assisted opening with flipper
Assisted opening with flipper
Clip type
4-position deep-carry (right/left; tip-up/down)
Reversible tip-up
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryTactical use
Heavy-duty cutting tasksOutdoor useExtended useEDC requiring strong blade
Not best for
Unknown
!Light everyday cutting tasks!Users preferring lightweight pocket knives
Common praise
Good grip due to aggressive texturingReliable assisted openingVersatile ambidextrous pocket clip positionsAffordable price
Excellent blade quality with superior edge retentionSolid all-metal constructionComfortable grip and ergonomicsAssisted opening and secure liner lockReversible tip-up pocket clip
Common complaints
Unknown
Heavy and bulky compared to average pocket knivesAssisted opening requires some forceClosing one-handed can be challenging

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online