← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Fatback vs Kershaw Misdirect

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Misdirect stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Fatback stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Misdirect stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Misdirect stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Misdirect stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Misdirect stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Fatback — Blade length: 89 mm (3.50 in)Kershaw Fatback — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)Kershaw Fatback — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Kershaw Fatback — Weight: 102 g (3.60 oz)Kershaw Fatback — Retail price: US$43.99Kershaw Misdirect — Blade length: 74 mm (2.91 in)Kershaw Misdirect — Overall length: 173 mm (6.81 in)Kershaw Misdirect — Closed length: 102 mm (4.02 in)Kershaw Misdirect — Weight: 91 g (3.21 oz)Kershaw Misdirect — Retail price: US$46.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$43.99Cheapest
US$46.99Most expensive
Weight
102 g (3.60 oz)Heaviest
91 g (3.21 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
89 mm (3.50 in)Longest
74 mm (2.91 in)Shortest
Overall length
197 mm (7.76 in)Longest
173 mm (6.81 in)Shortest
Closed length
108 mm (4.25 in)Longest
102 mm (4.02 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3.75 mm (0.15 in)
Unknown
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV
4Cr13 stainless steel
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon
Stainless steel
Finish
Black-oxide coating
BlackWash finish over black oxide coating (blade), bead-blasted matte finish (handle)
Lock type
Liner Lock
Frame lock
Opening method
Assisted opening with flipper
SpeedSafe assisted opening via flipper tab
Clip type
4-position deep-carry (right/left; tip-up/down)
Pocket clip, right or left hand tip-up and right hand tip-down
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryTactical use
Everyday carryPackage openingQuick deployment
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Good grip due to aggressive texturingReliable assisted openingVersatile ambidextrous pocket clip positionsAffordable price
Durable blade steel with good edge retentionAssisted opening is quick and reliableComfortable stainless steel handleVersatile pocket clip with multiple mounting optionsFrame lock provides secure blade locking
Common complaints
Unknown
Weight may be slightly high for ultra-light EDC usersBlade size/moderate for some users looking for smaller or larger knives

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online