← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Fatback vs Spyderco Bug

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Spyderco Bug stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 89% gap from the closest alternative. Spyderco Bug stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Spyderco Bug stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Spyderco Bug stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 89% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 827% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Bug stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 62% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 163% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Bug stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 64% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 178% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Fatback — Blade length: 89 mm (3.50 in)Kershaw Fatback — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)Kershaw Fatback — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Kershaw Fatback — Blade thickness: 3.75 mm (0.15 in)Kershaw Fatback — Weight: 102 g (3.60 oz)Kershaw Fatback — Retail price: US$43.99Spyderco Bug — Blade length: 32 mm (1.26 in)Spyderco Bug — Overall length: 74 mm (2.91 in)Spyderco Bug — Closed length: 41 mm (1.61 in)Spyderco Bug — Blade thickness: 1.8 mm (0.07 in)Spyderco Bug — Weight: 11 g (0.39 oz)Spyderco Bug — Retail price: US$33Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$43.99Most expensive
US$33Cheapest
Weight
102 g (3.60 oz)Heaviest
11 g (0.39 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
89 mm (3.50 in)Longest
32 mm (1.26 in)Shortest
Overall length
197 mm (7.76 in)Longest
74 mm (2.91 in)Shortest
Closed length
108 mm (4.25 in)Longest
41 mm (1.61 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3.75 mm (0.15 in)Thickest
1.8 mm (0.07 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV
12C27 stainless steel
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon
Stainless steel
Finish
Black-oxide coating
Satin
Lock type
Liner Lock
Slipjoint
Opening method
Assisted opening with flipper
Thumb Hole
Clip type
4-position deep-carry (right/left; tip-up/down)
Unknown
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryTactical use
Everyday CarryKeychainLight cutting tasks
Not best for
Unknown
!Heavy-duty use
Common praise
Good grip due to aggressive texturingReliable assisted openingVersatile ambidextrous pocket clip positionsAffordable price
Very lightweight and compactEasy to open due to thumb holeSharp blade with good edge retentionAttractive finish with possible engraving
Common complaints
Unknown
Not suitable for heavy-duty cuttingSlipjoint lock less secure than locking knives

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online