← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Fatback vs Spyderco Persistence

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Spyderco Persistence stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative. Spyderco Persistence stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 32% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Spyderco Persistence stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 32% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 47% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Spyderco Persistence stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Persistence stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Persistence stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 21% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 27% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Fatback — Blade length: 89 mm (3.50 in)Kershaw Fatback — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)Kershaw Fatback — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Kershaw Fatback — Blade thickness: 3.75 mm (0.15 in)Kershaw Fatback — Weight: 102 g (3.60 oz)Kershaw Fatback — Retail price: US$43.99Spyderco Persistence — Blade length: 70 mm (2.76 in)Spyderco Persistence — Overall length: 174 mm (6.85 in)Spyderco Persistence — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Spyderco Persistence — Blade thickness: 3.2 mm (0.13 in)Spyderco Persistence — Weight: 94 g (3.32 oz)Spyderco Persistence — Retail price: US$30Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$43.99Most expensive
US$30Cheapest
Weight
102 g (3.60 oz)Heaviest
94 g (3.32 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
89 mm (3.50 in)Longest
70 mm (2.76 in)Shortest
Overall length
197 mm (7.76 in)Longest
174 mm (6.85 in)Shortest
Closed length
108 mm (4.25 in)Longest
105 mm (4.13 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3.75 mm (0.15 in)Thickest
3.2 mm (0.13 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV
8Cr13MoV
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon
FRN or G-10
Finish
Black-oxide coating
PlainEdge or Black Oxide coated variants
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Assisted opening with flipper
Spyderco round hole
Clip type
4-position deep-carry (right/left; tip-up/down)
Four-position pocket clip (tip-up/tip-down, left/right)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryTactical use
Everyday carryEDCCampingHuntingUtilityTactical use
Not best for
Unknown
!Heavy batoning or intensive wood chopping
Common praise
Good grip due to aggressive texturingReliable assisted openingVersatile ambidextrous pocket clip positionsAffordable price
Secure grip with textured handleSmooth deployment with round holeSolid liner lock and ambidextrous clipGood edge retention for priceLightweight and compact
Common complaints
Unknown
G-10 handle can feel rough or less comfortable for long tasks8Cr13MoV steel requires maintenance in corrosive environmentsNot ideal for heavy-duty batoning or wood choppingSerrated edges can be harder to sharpen

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online