← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Fatback vs Spyderco Tenacious

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Fatback stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 55% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 55% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Tenacious stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 121% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Spyderco Tenacious stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Tenacious stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Tenacious stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Fatback — Blade length: 89 mm (3.50 in)Kershaw Fatback — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Kershaw Fatback — Blade thickness: 3.75 mm (0.15 in)Kershaw Fatback — Weight: 102 g (3.60 oz)Kershaw Fatback — Retail price: US$43.99Kershaw Fatback — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)Spyderco Tenacious — Blade length: 86 mm (3.39 in)Spyderco Tenacious — Closed length: 111 mm (4.37 in)Spyderco Tenacious — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Spyderco Tenacious — Weight: 116 g (4.09 oz)Spyderco Tenacious — Retail price: US$97Spyderco Tenacious — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)Blade lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail priceOverall length
Price & carry
Retail price
US$43.99Cheapest
US$97Most expensive
Weight
102 g (3.60 oz)Lightest
116 g (4.09 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
89 mm (3.50 in)Longest
86 mm (3.39 in)Shortest
Overall length
197 mm (7.76 in)
197 mm (7.76 in)
Closed length
108 mm (4.25 in)Shortest
111 mm (4.37 in)Longest
Blade thickness
3.75 mm (0.15 in)Thickest
3 mm (0.12 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon
G-10 Laminate
Finish
Black-oxide coating
Satin or non-reflective black oxide coating
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Assisted opening with flipper
Thumb Hole
Clip type
4-position deep-carry (right/left; tip-up/down)
Four-position Pocket Clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryTactical use
Daily CarryOutdoor UseBudget Tactical Use
Not best for
Unknown
!Heavy-duty construction work!Long term intensive use
Common praise
Good grip due to aggressive texturingReliable assisted openingVersatile ambidextrous pocket clip positionsAffordable price
Incredible value for moneyReal G-10 handles, not cheap plasticAmbidextrous 4-way pocket clipFull flat grind provides excellent slicingSmooth action with bronze washersSolid lockup and good ergonomics
Common complaints
Unknown
8Cr13MoV steel requires more frequent sharpeningLiner lock is less advanced than Compression LockNot a deep-carry pocket clip; knife shows in pocketMade in China, not USA

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online