← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Heist vs Kershaw Oso Sweet

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Heist stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Heist stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Heist stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Heist stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Heist stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Heist — Blade length: 81 mm (3.19 in)Kershaw Heist — Overall length: 193 mm (7.60 in)Kershaw Heist — Closed length: 112 mm (4.41 in)Kershaw Heist — Blade thickness: 2 mm (0.08 in)Kershaw Heist — Weight: 79 g (2.79 oz)Kershaw Heist — Retail price: US$55Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$55Most expensive
US$43.99Cheapest
Weight
79 g (2.79 oz)Lightest
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
81 mm (3.19 in)Longest
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Shortest
Overall length
193 mm (7.60 in)Longest
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Shortest
Closed length
112 mm (4.41 in)Longest
105 mm (4.13 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
2 mm (0.08 in)Thinnest
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
D2 Tool Steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon (GFN)
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Finish
Stonewash
Satin finish blade
Lock type
DuraLock crossbar lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Thumb Stud
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Clip type
Deep Carry Reversible Clip
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carry (EDC)Work projectsLightweight slicing
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Not best for
!Heavy chopping tasks!Corrosive environments without care
Unknown
Common praise
Thin blade stock for slicey grindSlim and lightweight constructionNo-flex handlesSmooth actionSolid ergonomicsGreat value for money
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Common complaints
Base of pocket clip can catch on pocket hem going in
None clearly supported by sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online