← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Mixtape vs Kershaw Oso Sweet

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Mixtape stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Mixtape stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Mixtape stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 21% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Mixtape stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Mixtape stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Mixtape — Blade length: 79 mm (3.11 in)Kershaw Mixtape — Overall length: 184 mm (7.24 in)Kershaw Mixtape — Closed length: 104 mm (4.09 in)Kershaw Mixtape — Weight: 75 g (2.65 oz)Kershaw Mixtape — Retail price: US$47.99Kershaw Mixtape — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail priceBlade thickness
Price & carry
Retail price
US$47.99Most expensive
US$43.99Cheapest
Weight
75 g (2.65 oz)Lightest
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
79 mm (3.11 in)Shortest
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Longest
Overall length
184 mm (7.24 in)Shortest
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Longest
Closed length
104 mm (4.09 in)Shortest
105 mm (4.13 in)Longest
Blade thickness
2.8 mm (0.11 in)
2.8 mm (0.11 in)
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Glass Filled Nylon
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Finish
Stonewashed
Satin finish blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Thumb disk
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Clip type
Right hand only, tip-up
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryLightweight usePiercing and general cutting tasks
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Lightweight designSharp bladeSecure liner lockEasy to clean constructionWicked sharp edge
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Common complaints
Unknown
None clearly supported by sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online