← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Mixtape vs Spyderco Efficient

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Mixtape stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Mixtape stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Mixtape stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Mixtape stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 55% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Mixtape stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the shortest option for overall length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Mixtape stands out as the longest option for overall length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Mixtape — Blade length: 79 mm (3.11 in)Kershaw Mixtape — Overall length: 184 mm (7.24 in)Kershaw Mixtape — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Mixtape — Weight: 75 g (2.65 oz)Kershaw Mixtape — Retail price: US$47.99Kershaw Mixtape — Closed length: 104 mm (4.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Blade length: 76 mm (2.99 in)Spyderco Efficient — Overall length: 180 mm (7.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Spyderco Efficient — Weight: 116 g (4.09 oz)Spyderco Efficient — Retail price: US$65Spyderco Efficient — Closed length: 104 mm (4.09 in)Blade lengthOverall lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail priceClosed length
Price & carry
Retail price
US$47.99Cheapest
US$65Most expensive
Weight
75 g (2.65 oz)Lightest
116 g (4.09 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
79 mm (3.11 in)Longest
76 mm (2.99 in)Shortest
Overall length
184 mm (7.24 in)Longest
180 mm (7.09 in)Shortest
Closed length
104 mm (4.09 in)
104 mm (4.09 in)
Blade thickness
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Glass Filled Nylon
G-10 Laminate
Finish
Stonewashed
Satin or Black oxide coated blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Thumb disk
Spyderco Trademark Round Hole for one-handed opening
Clip type
Right hand only, tip-up
Reversible hourglass clip, ambidextrous tip-up carry
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryLightweight usePiercing and general cutting tasks
Everyday carryTactical useValue-oriented users
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Lightweight designSharp bladeSecure liner lockEasy to clean constructionWicked sharp edge
Good value for the priceSolid build quality for a budget bladeComfortable ergonomic handleEffective and secure liner lock mechanismReversible clip for versatile carry options
Common complaints
Unknown
Blade steel is lower-end (8Cr13MoV) compared to high-end knives

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online