← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Outcome vs Spyderco Efficient

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Outcome stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Outcome stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Outcome stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Outcome stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Outcome stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Outcome stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Outcome — Blade length: 71 mm (2.80 in)Kershaw Outcome — Overall length: 170 mm (6.69 in)Kershaw Outcome — Closed length: 99 mm (3.90 in)Kershaw Outcome — Weight: 96.39 g (3.40 oz)Kershaw Outcome — Retail price: US$62.99Kershaw Outcome — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Spyderco Efficient — Blade length: 76 mm (2.99 in)Spyderco Efficient — Overall length: 180 mm (7.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Closed length: 104 mm (4.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Weight: 116 g (4.09 oz)Spyderco Efficient — Retail price: US$65Spyderco Efficient — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail priceBlade thickness
Price & carry
Retail price
US$62.99Cheapest
US$65Most expensive
Weight
96.39 g (3.40 oz)Lightest
116 g (4.09 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
71 mm (2.80 in)Shortest
76 mm (2.99 in)Longest
Overall length
170 mm (6.69 in)Shortest
180 mm (7.09 in)Longest
Closed length
99 mm (3.90 in)Shortest
104 mm (4.09 in)Longest
Blade thickness
3 mm (0.12 in)
3 mm (0.12 in)
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Stainless Steel
G-10 Laminate
Finish
Stonewashed
Satin or Black oxide coated blade
Lock type
Frame Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Assisted Opening
Spyderco Trademark Round Hole for one-handed opening
Clip type
Deep Carry Reversible Clip
Reversible hourglass clip, ambidextrous tip-up carry
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday Carry (EDC)General Work TasksLight Outdoor Use
Everyday carryTactical useValue-oriented users
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Reliable assisted opening mechanismRobust and durable designGood balance of size and weight for EDCReversible deep-carry pocket clip allows ambidextrous carry
Good value for the priceSolid build quality for a budget bladeComfortable ergonomic handleEffective and secure liner lock mechanismReversible clip for versatile carry options
Common complaints
Unknown
Blade steel is lower-end (8Cr13MoV) compared to high-end knives

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online