← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Oso Sweet vs Kershaw Outcome

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 30% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 30% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Outcome stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 43% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Outcome stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Outcome stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Outcome stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Kershaw Outcome — Blade length: 71 mm (2.80 in)Kershaw Outcome — Overall length: 170 mm (6.69 in)Kershaw Outcome — Closed length: 99 mm (3.90 in)Kershaw Outcome — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Kershaw Outcome — Weight: 96.39 g (3.40 oz)Kershaw Outcome — Retail price: US$62.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$43.99Cheapest
US$62.99Most expensive
Weight
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Lightest
96.39 g (3.40 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Longest
71 mm (2.80 in)Shortest
Overall length
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Longest
170 mm (6.69 in)Shortest
Closed length
105 mm (4.13 in)Longest
99 mm (3.90 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
8Cr13MoV
Handle material
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Stainless Steel
Finish
Satin finish blade
Stonewashed
Lock type
Liner Lock
Frame Lock
Opening method
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Assisted Opening
Clip type
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Deep Carry Reversible Clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Everyday Carry (EDC)General Work TasksLight Outdoor Use
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Reliable assisted opening mechanismRobust and durable designGood balance of size and weight for EDCReversible deep-carry pocket clip allows ambidextrous carry
Common complaints
None clearly supported by sources
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online