Spyderco Jester stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 82% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Outcome stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 21% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Cheapest
Kershaw Outcome stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 21% gap from the closest alternative.
Most expensive
Spyderco Jester stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 27% gap from the closest alternative.
Lightest
Spyderco Jester stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 82% gap from the closest alternative.
Heaviest
Kershaw Outcome stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 467% gap from the closest alternative.
Shortest
Spyderco Jester stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 36% gap from the closest alternative.
Longest
Kershaw Outcome stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 56% gap from the closest alternative.
Shortest
Spyderco Jester stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 31% gap from the closest alternative.
Longest
Kershaw Outcome stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 44% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
✓Reliable Assisted Opening Mechanism✓Robust And Durable Design✓Good Balance Of Size And Weight For EDC✓Reversible Deep Carry Pocket Clip Allows Ambidextrous Carry
✓Ergonomic Design Despite Small Size✓Precision Cutting Ability✓Lightweight And Comfortable Grip✓Variety Of Handle Materials And Blade Steels For Different Preferences
Common complaints
Unknown
⚠Some Models Lack A Pocket Clip⚠Very Small Blade Size Limits Heavy Use