← Back

Comparison Console

Spyderco Centofante 3 vs Spyderco Chicago

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative. Spyderco Chicago stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Centofante 3 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 29% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Spyderco Centofante 3 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 31% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Centofante 3 stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 44% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 36% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Centofante 3 stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 57% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Spyderco Centofante 3 — Blade length: 80 mm (3.15 in)Spyderco Centofante 3 — Overall length: 194 mm (7.64 in)Spyderco Centofante 3 — Closed length: 114 mm (4.49 in)Spyderco Centofante 3 — Blade thickness: 2 mm (0.08 in)Spyderco Centofante 3 — Weight: 71 g (2.50 oz)Spyderco Centofante 3 — Retail price: US$132Spyderco Chicago — Blade length: 51 mm (2.01 in)Spyderco Chicago — Overall length: 130 mm (5.12 in)Spyderco Chicago — Closed length: 79 mm (3.11 in)Spyderco Chicago — Blade thickness: 2.5 mm (0.10 in)Spyderco Chicago — Weight: 62 g (2.19 oz)Spyderco Chicago — Retail price: US$102Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$132Most expensive
US$102Cheapest
Weight
71 g (2.50 oz)Heaviest
62 g (2.19 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
80 mm (3.15 in)Longest
51 mm (2.01 in)Shortest
Overall length
194 mm (7.64 in)Longest
130 mm (5.12 in)Shortest
Closed length
114 mm (4.49 in)Longest
79 mm (3.11 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
2 mm (0.08 in)Thinnest
2.5 mm (0.10 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
VG-10 Stainless Steel
CTS BD1N
Handle material
FRN
G-10 Laminate
Finish
Satin
Satin
Lock type
Back Lock
LinerLock
Opening method
Unknown
Round Hole
Clip type
Adjustable, right side tip-up or tip-down carry
Reversible deep-pocket wire clip
Use case profile
Best for
EDCHuntingTactical useCampingSurvivalHiking
Everyday carryCampingHikingTactical use
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Elegant design with practical usabilityHigh-quality VG-10 steel blade with excellent sharpness and edge retentionLightweight and comfortable FRN handleSturdy back lock mechanismAdjustable clip allowing tip-up or tip-down carry
Compact and socially friendly sizeDurable CTS BD1N steel blade with good edge retention and corrosion resistanceSecure and comfortable G-10 handle with peel-ply textureReliable LinerLock mechanismReversible deep-pocket wire clip for ambidextrous tip-up carry
Common complaints
Unknown
Unknown