Comparison Console
Leatherman Charge Ti vs Leatherman OHT
EDC Multitools comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
Leatherman Charge Ti stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative. Leatherman OHT stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 31% gap from the closest alternative. Leatherman Charge Ti stands out as the most tools option for tool count, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Leatherman OHT stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 31% gap from the closest alternative.
Leatherman Charge Ti stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 46% gap from the closest alternative.
Leatherman Charge Ti stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative.
Leatherman OHT stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 18% gap from the closest alternative.
Leatherman OHT stands out as the fewest tools option for tool count, with about a 16% gap from the closest alternative.
Leatherman Charge Ti stands out as the most tools option for tool count, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative.
Leatherman Charge Ti stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.
Leatherman OHT stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$173Most expensive
US$118.9Cheapest
Weight
238 g (8.40 oz)Lightest
280.99 g (9.91 oz)Heaviest
Closed length
102 mm (4.02 in)Shortest
114.3 mm (4.50 in)Longest
Open length
160 mm (6.30 in)Shortest
168.275 mm (6.63 in)Longest
Dimensions
Width
Unknown
Unknown
Thickness
Unknown
Unknown
Tools
Tool count
19Most tools
16Fewest tools
Tools
Needlenose PliersRegular PliersWire CuttersHard Wire CuttersWire Stripper154CM Stainless Steel Clip Point Blade420hc Serrated BladeSawSpring Action Scissors8 Inch (19 Cm) RulerCan OpenerBottle OpenerWood/metal FileDiamond Coated FileLarge Bit DriverSmall Bit DriverLarge ScrewdriverWire CrimperFixed Lanyard Ring
Needlenose PliersRegular PliersSpring Loaded Wire CuttersHard Wire CuttersFine Edge Knife BladeSerrated Knife BladeWood SawSmall Flathead ScrewdriverMedium Flathead ScrewdriverLarge Flathead ScrewdriverPhillips Head ScrewdriverCan OpenerBottle OpenerOxygen Tank WrenchStrap CutterCleaning Rod Attachment
Plier type
Needle-nose and Regular Pliers
Needle-nose and Regular Pliers
One-hand opening
Yes
Yes
Pocket clip
Yes
Unknown
Sheath included
Yes
Yes
Use case profile
Best for
EDC Multitool UseCamping And Outdoor TasksBike Touring And RepairPrecision And Durable Cutting Tasks
One Handed OperationQuick Access To Multiple ToolsOutdoor UseOn Site JobsHome Use
Common praise
Extensive Tool Set Covering Many FunctionsDurable Titanium Handle Scales And Stainless Steel BuildOne Handed Accessibility To ToolsIncludes Premium 154CM Steel Main BladeCompact Size With Comparatively Light Weight For Multitools
Easy One Handed Opening And Tool DeploymentSpring Loaded Pliers Reduce Hand FatigueClear Imprinted Tool Locations For Quick IdentificationSecure Tool Locks For SafetyVersatile Tool Set For Various Tasks
Common complaints
Titanium Handles Provide No Structural Strength Benefit, Mainly AestheticSerrated Blade Uses Standard Stainless Steel Not Premium SteelScissors Are Smaller New Generation Design, Some Prefer Older Folding Scissors Design
Some Users Find Multitool Weight Somewhat HeavyLimited Information On Blade Steel Quality Beyond 420hc Stainless Steel
Dataset Expansion
Missing a brand?
Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.
Community indexing queue online