Comparison Console
Maxpedition Padded Fatty Pocket Organizer vs Maxpedition Skinny Pocket Organizer
EDC Pouches comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
Maxpedition Skinny Pocket Organizer stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative. Maxpedition Padded Fatty Pocket Organizer stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Maxpedition Padded Fatty Pocket Organizer stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.
Maxpedition Skinny Pocket Organizer stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.
Maxpedition Skinny Pocket Organizer stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.
Maxpedition Padded Fatty Pocket Organizer stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 16% gap from the closest alternative.
Maxpedition Padded Fatty Pocket Organizer stands out as the lowest option for height, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.
Maxpedition Skinny Pocket Organizer stands out as the highest option for height, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.
Maxpedition Skinny Pocket Organizer stands out as the narrowest option for width, with about a 50% gap from the closest alternative.
Maxpedition Padded Fatty Pocket Organizer stands out as the widest option for width, with about a 100% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$35.99Cheapest
US$38.99Most expensive
Weight
157 g (5.54 oz)Heaviest
135 g (4.76 oz)Lightest
Capacity
Unknown
Unknown
Dimensions
Height
177.8 mm (7.00 in)Shortest
203.2 mm (8.00 in)Tallest
Width
127 mm (5.00 in)Widest
63.5 mm (2.50 in)Narrowest
Depth
50.8 mm (2.00 in)Shallowest
101.6 mm (4.00 in)Deepest
Maximum expanded depth
Unknown
Unknown
Organization
Elastic loops
16Most loops
13Fewest loops
Elastic loop sizes
SmallSmallSmallSmallSmallSmallSmallSmallSmallMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMedium
SmallSmallSmallSmallSmallSmallSmallSmallSmallSmallSmallSmallSmall
Small elastic loops
9Lowest
13Highest
Medium elastic loops
7Highest
0Lowest
Large elastic loops
0
0
Pocket compartments
4Highest
3Lowest
Slip pockets
2Fewest pockets
3Most pockets
Zippered mesh pockets
1Most pockets
0Fewest pockets
Dividers
0Lowest
12Highest
Opening type
Clamshell
Clamshell
Materials & closure
Primary shell material
1000-Denier ballistic nylon fabric with triple polyurethane coating and Teflon fabric protector
1050-Denier water and abrasion resistant lightweight ballistic nylon fabric
Water resistance
Water and abrasion resistant, triple polyurethane coated, Teflon fabric protector
Triple polyurethane coated for water resistance
Zipper system
YKK high strength zippers
YKK zippers
Mounting & carry
MOLLE/PALS compatible
Yes
Yes
MOLLE/PALS rows
Unknown
1
Loop panel height
50.8 mm (2.00 in)Lowest
76.2 mm (3.00 in)Highest
Loop panel width
76.2 mm (3.00 in)Highest
50.8 mm (2.00 in)Lowest
Carry interfaces
Oversized Carry HandleAttachment WebbingMOLLE And PALS Compatible
MOLLE WebbingHeavy Duty Grab Handle LoopAttachment Webbing
Use case profile
Best for
Tactical ProfessionalsOutdoor EnthusiastsFirst RespondersTravelersCommuters
EDC (everyday Carry)Small Tool And Gadget OrganizationPortable Multi Tool Management
Not best for
Minimalist Carry Enthusiasts
Large Gear Storage
Common praise
Durable ConstructionExcellent Internal OrganizationEffective Padded ProtectionVersatile MOLLE CompatibilityWater Resistant Fabric
Durable And Well Built ConstructionEfficient Organization With Multiple CompartmentsClamshell Opening Allows Easy AccessLightweight And Compact Design
Common complaints
Relatively Large Size For Minimalist CarryPrice Higher Than Basic PouchesCould Use More Internal Zippered Pockets
Limited Width Restricts Size Of Stored ItemsElastic Loops May Be Too Small For Some Tools
Dataset Expansion
Missing a brand?
Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.
Community indexing queue online