← Back

Comparison Console

Olight Warrior Mini 3 vs Olight Warrior Nano

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Olight Warrior Nano stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative. Olight Warrior Nano stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 36% gap from the closest alternative. Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 46% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Olight Warrior Nano stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 36% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 56% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Olight Warrior Nano stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Olight Warrior Nano stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 31% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 46% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 53% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Olight Warrior Nano stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 113% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Olight Warrior Mini 3 — Beam distance: 240 m (787 ft)Olight Warrior Mini 3 — Max candela: 14400 cdOlight Warrior Mini 3 — Weight: 105 g (3.70 oz)Olight Warrior Mini 3 — Length: 106.5 mm (4.19 in)Olight Warrior Mini 3 — Retail price: US$87.95Olight Warrior Mini 3 — Max lumens: 1750 lmOlight Warrior Nano — Beam distance: 135 m (443 ft)Olight Warrior Nano — Max candela: 4700 cdOlight Warrior Nano — Weight: 85 g (3.00 oz)Olight Warrior Nano — Length: 81 mm (3.19 in)Olight Warrior Nano — Retail price: US$56.24Olight Warrior Nano — Max lumens: 1200 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$87.95Most expensive
US$56.24Cheapest
Weight
105 g (3.70 oz)Heaviest
85 g (3.00 oz)Lightest
Length
106.5 mm (4.19 in)Longest
81 mm (3.19 in)Shortest
Output
Max lumens
1750 lmHighest output
1200 lmLowest output
Max candela
14400 cdHighest candela
4700 cdLowest candela
Beam distance
240 m (787 ft)Highest
135 m (443 ft)Lowest
Max runtime
27000 minShortest runtime
57600 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
1*18650 rechargeable lithium-ion
1×18350 rechargeable lithium-ion
Charging type
Proprietary magnetic MCC3 charging cable
Proprietary magnetic USB charging
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IPX8
IPX8
Impact resistance
1.5 m (5 ft)
Unknown
Material
Aluminum alloy
Aluminum alloy
Use case profile
Best for
EDCTactical useSelf-defenseOutdoors lighting
Everyday carry (EDC)Outdoor activitiesSelf-defenseTactical use
Common praise
High output lumens for sizeSolid build qualityDual switches for tactical and daily useIPX8 waterproof ratingMagnetic charging convenience
Compact size with high outputVersatile dual-switch interfaceLong runtime in Moonlight modeGood build quality and pocket-friendlyIncludes proprietary rechargeable battery and magnetic charging
Common complaints
Minor size reduction from previous model may affect grip comfortNo increase in max output from previous generationTail switch complexity may require learning curve
Proprietary battery and charging limit battery interchangeabilityNo lanyard includedSome users may find proprietary charging inconvenient