← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Misdirect vs Kershaw Oso Sweet

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight. Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Misdirect stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight.

Heaviest

Kershaw Misdirect stands out as the heaviest option for weight.

Shortest

Kershaw Misdirect stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Misdirect stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Misdirect — Blade length: 74 mm (2.91 in)Kershaw Misdirect — Overall length: 173 mm (6.81 in)Kershaw Misdirect — Closed length: 102 mm (4.02 in)Kershaw Misdirect — Weight: 91 g (3.21 oz)Kershaw Misdirect — Retail price: US$46.99Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$46.99Most expensive
US$43.99Cheapest
Weight
91 g (3.21 oz)Heaviest
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
74 mm (2.91 in)Shortest
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Longest
Overall length
173 mm (6.81 in)Shortest
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Longest
Closed length
102 mm (4.02 in)Shortest
105 mm (4.13 in)Longest
Blade thickness
Unknown
2.8 mm (0.11 in)
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
4Cr13 stainless steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Stainless steel
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Finish
BlackWash finish over black oxide coating (blade), bead-blasted matte finish (handle)
Satin finish blade
Lock type
Frame lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
SpeedSafe assisted opening via flipper tab
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Clip type
Pocket clip, right or left hand tip-up and right hand tip-down
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryPackage openingQuick deployment
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Durable blade steel with good edge retentionAssisted opening is quick and reliableComfortable stainless steel handleVersatile pocket clip with multiple mounting optionsFrame lock provides secure blade locking
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Common complaints
Weight may be slightly high for ultra-light EDC usersBlade size/moderate for some users looking for smaller or larger knives
None clearly supported by sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online