← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Oso Sweet vs Kershaw Scrambler

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 38% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Scrambler stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Scrambler stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 38% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Scrambler stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 63% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Scrambler stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Scrambler stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Kershaw Scrambler — Blade length: 88.9 mm (3.50 in)Kershaw Scrambler — Overall length: 200 mm (7.87 in)Kershaw Scrambler — Closed length: 111.1 mm (4.37 in)Kershaw Scrambler — Weight: 147.4 g (5.20 oz)Kershaw Scrambler — Retail price: US$39.95Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$43.99Most expensive
US$39.95Cheapest
Weight
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Lightest
147.4 g (5.20 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Shortest
88.9 mm (3.50 in)Longest
Overall length
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Shortest
200 mm (7.87 in)Longest
Closed length
105 mm (4.13 in)Shortest
111.1 mm (4.37 in)Longest
Blade thickness
2.8 mm (0.11 in)
Unknown
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Textured G-10 front with steel bolster, 410 steel back
Finish
Satin finish blade
Blade with titanium carbo-nitride coating, handles have titanium carbo-nitride coated bolster and back scale
Lock type
Liner Lock
Frame lock
Opening method
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
SpeedSafe assisted opening with ambidextrous flipper
Clip type
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Reversible steel pocket clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Everyday carryGeneral useSlice tasks
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Smooth and fast assisted openingGood edge retention for the steel typeComfortable handle with good gripAmbidextrous carrying options with reversible pocket clip
Common complaints
None clearly supported by sources
Weight is moderate for some usersBlade steel is adequate but not premiumLimited availability due to status discontinued in some listings

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online