← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Oso Sweet vs Spyderco Cat

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Spyderco Cat stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 59% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 59% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Cat stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 146% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Spyderco Cat stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 28% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Cat stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Cat stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 28% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Spyderco Cat — Blade length: 62 mm (2.44 in)Spyderco Cat — Overall length: 151 mm (5.94 in)Spyderco Cat — Closed length: 90 mm (3.54 in)Spyderco Cat — Blade thickness: 2.5 mm (0.10 in)Spyderco Cat — Weight: 71 g (2.50 oz)Spyderco Cat — Retail price: US$108Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$43.99Cheapest
US$108Most expensive
Weight
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Heaviest
71 g (2.50 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Longest
62 mm (2.44 in)Shortest
Overall length
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Longest
151 mm (5.94 in)Shortest
Closed length
105 mm (4.13 in)Longest
90 mm (3.54 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thickest
2.5 mm (0.10 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
CTS BD1N
Handle material
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
G-10 Laminate
Finish
Satin finish blade
Unknown
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Unknown
Clip type
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Wire Clip, reversible, deep-pocket, tip-up carry
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Everyday CarryUrban professionalsTravelersOutdoor enthusiasts
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Compact and legally compliant sizeSmooth slicing capability due to full-flat-ground bladeComfortable, ergonomic G-10 handleEnhanced safety with finger choilReversible wire clip for ambidextrous carry
Common complaints
None clearly supported by sources
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online