← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Oso Sweet vs Spyderco GrassHopper

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Spyderco GrassHopper stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 56% gap from the closest alternative. Spyderco GrassHopper stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Spyderco GrassHopper stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Spyderco GrassHopper stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 56% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 129% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco GrassHopper stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 49% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco GrassHopper stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 27% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 36% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Spyderco GrassHopper — Blade length: 58.4 mm (2.30 in)Spyderco GrassHopper — Overall length: 128.8 mm (5.07 in)Spyderco GrassHopper — Closed length: 70.4 mm (2.77 in)Spyderco GrassHopper — Weight: 39.69 g (1.40 oz)Spyderco GrassHopper — Retail price: US$33Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$43.99Most expensive
US$33Cheapest
Weight
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Heaviest
39.69 g (1.40 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Longest
58.4 mm (2.30 in)Shortest
Overall length
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Longest
128.8 mm (5.07 in)Shortest
Closed length
105 mm (4.13 in)Longest
70.4 mm (2.77 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
2.8 mm (0.11 in)
Unknown
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Sandvik 12C27 stainless steel, also referenced as 3Cr stainless steel
Handle material
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Blue G-10 and stainless steel (varies by listing)
Finish
Satin finish blade
Satin
Lock type
Liner Lock
Non-locking slipjoint
Opening method
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Thumb hole for one-handed opening
Clip type
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Unknown
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
EDCCampingHuntingTacticalSurvival
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Compact and easy to carryGood size for work knifeAmbidextrous one-hand opening
Common complaints
None clearly supported by sources
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online