← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Oso Sweet vs Zero Tolerance 0750

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 74% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 74% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Zero Tolerance 0750 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 286% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Zero Tolerance 0750 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 16% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Zero Tolerance 0750 stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Zero Tolerance 0750 stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Zero Tolerance 0750 — Blade length: 81 mm (3.19 in)Zero Tolerance 0750 — Overall length: 184 mm (7.24 in)Zero Tolerance 0750 — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Zero Tolerance 0750 — Blade thickness: 3.07 mm (0.12 in)Zero Tolerance 0750 — Weight: 105 g (3.70 oz)Zero Tolerance 0750 — Retail price: US$170Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$43.99Cheapest
US$170Most expensive
Weight
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Lightest
105 g (3.70 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Shortest
81 mm (3.19 in)Longest
Overall length
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Longest
184 mm (7.24 in)Shortest
Closed length
105 mm (4.13 in)Shortest
108 mm (4.25 in)Longest
Blade thickness
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
3.07 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
S30V stainless steel
Handle material
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Textured Black G-10
Finish
Satin finish blade
Black DLC coating on blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper or thumbstud)
Clip type
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Tri-mount pocket clip (tip-up/tip-down one side; single position other)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Controlled pulling cutsCutting rope, line, webbing, shrubberyCarpet installationMarine useEmergency service rescue scenarios
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Excellent edge retention due to S30V steelIdeal design for pulling cutsVersatile carrying options with tri-mount clipGood grip handle material
Common complaints
None clearly supported by sources
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online